Jump to content

Charlotte Gateway Station and Railroad Improvements


dubone

Recommended Posts

It's a shame that re-storing, retro-fitting and expanding on the old Seaboard Air Line Railroad Passenger Station is not currently a viable alternative. The Blue Line extension passes so close that you could create a station/platform right at Alpha Mill with and extended pedestrian walkway to N College to allow easy transfer between Amtrak and LRT line.

I supposed it could be feasible to build something with promise and even act as an anchor catalyst to the N-Tryon if it were possible to purchased all the land surrounding the existing station north of 12th St to the existing ROW, and west from the Blue Line Extension to Graham St.

 

Edited by RVA2CLT
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I have always wondered why the existing Seaboard station wasn't seriously considered. Part of the deal could include a replacement, modernized facility for the current homeless shelter/soup kitchen service currently there. It is a unique and beautiful building to restore for passenger trains, and would likely be a lot cheaper and provide a direct connection to the Blue Line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why can't we build, not necessarily on the scale of it, but something like the new Union Station project in Washington DC? That project is set to completely revive a neighborhood, and North Tryon desperately needs that. I board trains to Raleigh (when i go) in Kannapolis and that is a nicer station than Charlotte.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In regards to the derailment of the Carolinian today, despite a truck stuck on the tracks, in classic fashion local TV news managed to blame the Amtrak train and question passenger rail safety.

Question: do you think the Seaboard Station could be a viable alternative to Gateway Station despite being separated from Uptown by I-277? Are there ways to make the site appealing to developers and add pedestrian access to Uptown? Or is the idea of using the Seaboard Station a non starter. I assume dealing with CSX would be a large obstacle.

Edited by ajfunder
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the path in and out of Seaboard station from the NCRR and NS there appears to be no way to create a platform which:

1) does not foul and cross CSX

or

2) does not require passengers to walk across active CSX tracks (this will never happen)

 

In essence using Seaboard station would create a second grade crossing of NS and CSX -- remember not long ago the Federal Government was willing to pay more than $200 million to eliminate the problems created by the existing grade crossing. CSX would never consent to a second set of crossings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old Seabord station is indeed beautiful and the best way to get a glimpse of it is to railfan at this obscure spot where N Church crosses both the NS and CSX tracks (35.235238,-80.834061):

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=28202&hl=en&ll=35.235286,-80.833996&spn=0.002779,0.004128&sll=35.203153,-80.839829&sspn=0.503276,1.056747&hnear=Charlotte,+North+Carolina+28202&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=35.235238,-80.834061&panoid=Q0cdSPbd1XH_r0H-17H7xg&cbp=12,165.34,,0,9.12

 

The station only makes sense if commuter service to Matthews commences along a double-tracked CSX mainline.  Otherwise. its location on the south side of the tracks along the East-West trunkline creates a problem for Piedmont/Carolinian/Red Line trains which would only be able to unload their pax on the north side of the tracks.  A pedestrian bridge would solve the problem of getting to the south side but it's safe to assume most passengers would care most about connecting to the BLE, so the southeast corner of Charlotte Yard is still the best option for a station in that vicinity.

Edited by ChessieCat
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The old Seabord station is indeed beautiful and the best way to get a glimpse of it is to railfan at this obscure spot where N Church crosses both the NS and CSX tracks:

https://maps.google.com/maps?q=28202&hl=en&ll=35.235286,-80.833996&spn=0.002779,0.004128&sll=35.203153,-80.839829&sspn=0.503276,1.056747&hnear=Charlotte,+North+Carolina+28202&t=h&z=19&layer=c&cbll=35.235238,-80.834061&panoid=Q0cdSPbd1XH_r0H-17H7xg&cbp=12,165.34,,0,9.12

 

The station only makes sense if commuter service to Matthews commences along a double-tracked CSX mainline.  Otherwise. its location on the south side of the tracks along the East-West trunkline creates a problem for Piedmont/Carolinian/Red Line trains which would only be able to unload their pax on the north side of the tracks.  A pedestrian bridge would solve the problem of getting to the south side but it's safe to assume most passengers would care most about connecting to the BLE, so the southeast corner of Charlotte Yard is still the best option for a station in that vicinity.

File this under things I didn't know existed. Beautiful.

http://www.bing.com/maps/default.aspx?q=1100+N.+Church+St.+Charlotte%2c+NC&mkt=en&FORM=HDRSC4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know, you guys are all down on the Gateway Station plan but truth is, Seaboard is probably an inferior location compared with Gateway. It is a somewhat dilapidated industrial area outside the 277 loop. Other than the possible connection to the blue line, the Seaboard station is only marginally better than the existing station from a location standpoint. Plus, could a platform even be added there on the blue line anyway? Platforms basically have to go at a spot where the rail line is not sloped. At the very least it would require a chunk of the line to be rebuilt.

 

If the only concern is connectivity with the blue line, there might be an alternate way to achieve this. NCDOT is considering where to put a train station in the vicinity of Harrisburg. A block at the corner of Mallard Creek Church Rd and University City Blvd is on the short list. That would be about a 3/4 mile extension of the Blue Line.

 

The existing Charlotte Amtrak station feels very dated right now, sure, but it's also sort of cool in a retro way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.google.com/maps/@35.233446,-80.832954,3a,75y,9.92h,72.21t/data=!3m4!1e1!3m2!1s46WVmaxWANVhjdAe6uNcGg!2e0

I think i Have seen it before, and just thought it was part of urban ministries, what a waste of a great building. 

hold hold hold hold hold on...  "waste of a building" is rather harsh for an organization that does A LOT of good.  urban ministries does use the building.

Edited by archiham04
Link to comment
Share on other sites

hold hold hold hold hold on...  "waste of a building" is rather harsh for an organization that does A LOT of good.  urban ministries does use the building.

I wasn't calling it a waste of a building in regards to Urban Ministries... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would encourage all listening (er reading...) to got to urban ministries and see this facility if you haven't.  It is so difficult to explain in words... impressive, depressing, and inspiring all at once.  If you don't know about what they do, you should take a few minutes to learn.  They are fighting a good fight.  I think I first visited to deliver toiletries for Room in the Inn or something... 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Plans move forward to build new transportation hub in uptown

 

On Wednesday night, the Metropolitan Transit Commission (MTC) approved the revised municipal agreement, originally signed in 2009, between the City of Charlotte and NCDOT.

 

Votaw says the facility could be ready around the time phase two of street car opens in 2018-2019.

 

[[http://www.wcnc.com/story/news/local/2015/03/26/plans-move-forward-to-build-new-transportation-hub-in-uptown/70474240/

Edited by RiverwoodCLT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, this is weird. My guess is there could be two root causes to this 'movement'

1) some type of miracle happened and some small amount of money for the project was found at the federal level

Or

2) the past agreement between CDOT and NCDOT was about to go dormant and they needed some activity to insure that the project didn't get lost in a file cabinet in Raleigh

Number 2 is far more likely, although there is a remote possibility that the FRA was able to find some cash or a loan for the freight side of the trackwork.

The current holdup on the project is actually due to NS sending their demand modeling for the tracks to a consultant, that report is due around September. AFIK no planning, plotting or designwork to any part of the station can begin until NS discloses their track requirements.

Edited by kermit
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ It was Hines (I probably got the name wrong, but it starts with an H). There has been discussions that they drooped out of the project due to uncertain track layouts which changed the amount of developable land. Other stories on the project said Haines was still involved -- its very unclear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.