Should MI have a primary do-over?

[OneSweetWorld]

There has been a lot of debate over whether or not Michigan democrats should have another chance at voicing their opinions in the presidential election. Surprisingly, I couldn't find any articles online about this, but I'm sure most of you know what's going on, and the options that have been laid out for the party to hold a second primary. So what do you guys think? Should the Michigan democratic party have a second chance?

[snoogit]

Absolutely yes! The first primary was horribly unacceptable It was botched up at the beginning, and really should have been postponed once it was realized that the DNC wasn't going to change their stance.

[snoogit]

Looks like the decision has been made:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080314/ap_on_...rimary_scramble

Michigan Democrats agreed Friday to push a do-over primary in early June to give them a say in the close presidential race between Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama.

[ZachariahDaMan]

Yep! The first one was pointless.

[egrguy]

Yes; conditional to it not being tax payer funded. Which by the sound of it, PA GOV Ed Randell appears to be able to fund it through private donations. We'll see if they can get something agreed upon to have a real primary this time around.

[RustTown]

Currently, every parties onboard except the Obama campaign. Everyone is saying today will be the last day to get this done or it most likely won't get done.