Jump to content

Mixson


Native_Son

Recommended Posts

http://www.insidemixson.com/Watch

http://www.charleston.net/news/2008/aug/18..._resident51183/

I looked and didn't see this mentioned anywhere else here (at least not in the topic title) and it is definitely worth posting. The comments in the Charleston Net article are particularly interesting.

The concept looks good: higher density, smaller living space. The pictures on the Mixson site of the inside and outside of the places look cool. The location is the issue, N Charleston has the 7th most murders per capita in the US. But, if it's going to turn around it's going to take things like this, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 11
  • Created
  • Last Reply

This looks decent enough. The site plan seems pretty good (though I would like to see more detail), and I generally like the look of it. I like the high amount of connectivity, though I think for a new urban development it has entirely too many garages and an apparent lack of street parking. I also think everything is too tall because there are garages on the ground level. I realize there are probably building regulations that force the height due to a flooding potential, etc.

Thanks for the update!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This looks decent enough. The site plan seems pretty good (though I would like to see more detail), and I generally like the look of it. I like the high amount of connectivity, though I think for a new urban development it has entirely too many garages and an apparent lack of street parking. I also think everything is too tall because there are garages on the ground level. I realize there are probably building regulations that force the height due to a flooding potential, etc.

Thanks for the update!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there you have it. Your problem is not the presence of the cars, its the separation of I'On from other land uses. I completely agree that issue is a major problem and despite all of the good things about I'On that is one of its major drawbacks. For what its worth, there are plenty of studies out there that show on street parking makes for safer streets, which is why I don't like the garages. Some on-site car storage is fine, but their renderings make it seem as though there will be no visible cars in Mixson, and IMO that will kill any future this development has if it turns out to be true. Despite my problems with our car-oriented society, they are necessary to add life to a neighborhood. Infact, all of the old neighborhoods we love in every city will have on-street parking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


OK, fair enough. The cars on the street in I'on themselves don't bother me, you're right. It's the sense that you can't really come or go anywhere worthwhile without the cars, just like in Snee Farm or Hobcaw or wherever else, and yet there is less space. So you have density without the benefits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Neck area is going to experience a major resurgence. There are now 3 significant redevelopment projects in the area, all of which will bring more people to the area, increase land values around them, and increase the desirability of the area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.