Jump to content

Farmers plans to add 1,600 new jobs


egrguy

Recommended Posts

Farmers plans to add 1,600 new jobs.

Wow, this is a pretty huge jobs announcement. Based on Granholm planning on being around for the official announcement I am assuming that tomorrow's MEGA vote is a formality and that the decision has already been made for approving tax credits.

Including Davenport's expansion right across the street, that area will be seeing extended activity.

I wonder if the planned hotel there by M6 and Beltine will receive renewed interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 29
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Fantastic news. West Michigan prevails. :)

Joe

Farmers plans to add 1,600 new jobs.

Wow, this is a pretty huge jobs announcement. Based on Granholm planning on being around for the official announcement I am assuming that tomorrow's MEGA vote is a formality and that the decision has already been made for approving tax credits.

Including Davenport's expansion right across the street, that area will be seeing extended activity.

I wonder if the planned hotel there by M6 and Beltine will receive renewed interest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to kill anyone's buzz (this is great news, don't get me wrong), but that's 1,600 jobs over 17 years...or about 94 per year. How anyone can speculate on their staffing needs 17 years from now is beyond me. Hell, these days how many of us can guarantee whether we'll be employed a month from now?

I know there have been some people questioning the effectiveness of MEGA tax credits...but it does kind of make you wonder what the net effect of higher taxes + specialized incentives is versus an across-the-board tax reduction. These announcements don't necessarily meet their promises...but they sure do make for good headlines.

Michigan has bled an incredible number of manufacturing jobs in the last 10 years (not all necessarily related to tax policy, obviously). It would take a lot of relatively small tax credits to make up for that loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to kill anyone's buzz (this is great news, don't get me wrong), but that's 1,600 jobs over 17 years...or about 94 per year. How anyone can speculate on their staffing needs 17 years from now is beyond me. Hell, these days how many of us can guarantee whether we'll be employed a month from now?

I know there have been some people questioning the effectiveness of MEGA tax credits...but it does kind of make you wonder what the net effect of higher taxes + specialized incentives is versus an across-the-board tax reduction. These announcements don't necessarily meet their promises...but they sure do make for good headlines.

Michigan has bled an incredible number of manufacturing jobs in the last 10 years (not all necessarily related to tax policy, obviously). It would take a lot of relatively small tax credits to make up for that loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the 1600 jobs purely Farmers positions? If so, you have the addition of adding 275,000 sf ft of building creation; a nice boon to the area's construction work force as well.

I agree w/ grdad's statement of what news do people want to hear? You can't add thousands of jobs overnight; its a process to build the infrastructure needed, time to hire and train the additional staff.

4,500 jobs is nothing to sneeze at even if happening over several years. I think the most important impact is that these companies are all staying put and adding staff.

The opposite could be what is happening in Dayton, OH with ATM manufactorer NCR who has been a Dayton institution for decades is picking up shop and moving their HQ to Georgia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the 1600 jobs purely Farmers positions? If so, you have the addition of adding 275,000 sf ft of building creation; a nice boon to the area's construction work force as well.

I agree w/ grdad's statement of what news do people want to hear? You can't add thousands of jobs overnight; its a process to build the infrastructure needed, time to hire and train the additional staff.

4,500 jobs is nothing to sneeze at even if happening over several years. I think the most important impact is that these companies are all staying put and adding staff.

The opposite could be what is happening in Dayton, OH with ATM manufactorer NCR who has been a Dayton institution for decades is picking up shop and moving their HQ to Georgia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe some of the comments on MLive and other sites about these announcements. This to me looks like jobs. Although the design is like nails on a chalkboard suburban, 275,000 sf has gotta hold at least a few people.

3635923452_792b8df9fe_o.jpg

3635923590_59be6d9f62_o.jpg

3635923776_11b1b8a9b4_o.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the government matches private investments by over 360%, you know something is downright corrupt. I don't care how much pride I have in my community, I'm moving out of the state if my taxes are redistributed upward. How many real jobs did it take to support this? And under an economy where companies can't even support their own weight. And a state that can't support itself. And by the way, the debt where in already. What doesn't make sense in your own personal finance, ALSO doesn't make sense with the government.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the government matches private investments by over 360%, you know something is downright corrupt. I don't care how much pride I have in my community, I'm moving out of the state if my taxes are redistributed upward. How many real jobs did it take to support this? And under an economy where companies can't even support their own weight. And a state that can't support itself. And by the way, the debt where in already. What doesn't make sense in your own personal finance, ALSO doesn't make sense with the government.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Economic Growth Authority approved $114 million in tax credits, making the $145 million investments possible."

If 145 million of investments can only be made possible if 114 million in tax incentives are made available, then really only the difference is real private capital. If i can only spend $3 if you give me $2, then I came with $1 to the table. Same principle applies here. In this case, only $31,000,000 was brought to the table by private entities while the government forked over $114,000,000. That divided by 31,000,000 multiplied by 100 gives you the % the government is spending compared to private investors. I don't know about you, but the word incentive does not mean, paying for 78.5% of the investment. I'm against all wealth redistribution, but I can't see how upward wealth redistribution can be seen as a good thing! In an economy like this, if any headline has the word jobs, and is not followed by loss, it is seen as a good thing, no questions asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Economic Growth Authority approved $114 million in tax credits, making the $145 million investments possible."

If 145 million of investments can only be made possible if 114 million in tax incentives are made available, then really only the difference is real private capital. If i can only spend $3 if you give me $2, then I came with $1 to the table. Same principle applies here. In this case, only $31,000,000 was brought to the table by private entities while the government forked over $114,000,000. That divided by 31,000,000 multiplied by 100 gives you the % the government is spending compared to private investors. I don't know about you, but the word incentive does not mean, paying for 78.5% of the investment. I'm against all wealth redistribution, but I can't see how upward wealth redistribution can be seen as a good thing! In an economy like this, if any headline has the word jobs, and is not followed by loss, it is seen as a good thing, no questions asked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then where do you draw the line if unlimited spending always makes a return? When did government become investors? How is this fair to 99% of other businesses? Who ultimately payed for this and who ultimately cashed in? Would you favor a child as much as the government favors a particular business? If tax money creates jobs, then perpetual motion should work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then where do you draw the line if unlimited spending always makes a return? When did government become investors? How is this fair to 99% of other businesses? Who ultimately payed for this and who ultimately cashed in? Would you favor a child as much as the government favors a particular business? If tax money creates jobs, then perpetual motion should work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can't believe some of the comments on MLive and other sites about these announcements. This to me looks like jobs. Although the design is like nails on a chalkboard suburban, 275,000 sf has gotta hold at least a few people.

3635923776_11b1b8a9b4_o.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Then where do you draw the line if unlimited spending always makes a return? When did government become investors? How is this fair to 99% of other businesses? Who ultimately payed for this and who ultimately cashed in? Would you favor a child as much as the government favors a particular business? If tax money creates jobs, then perpetual motion should work.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry. I have three kids. None of them get treated equally. :dontknow:

Tax breaks for business expansions/relocations is the world we live in. Welcome to globalization. If Michigan puts an end to it, 20 other states are ready to watch us go down in flames (no joke). Would I prefer that Michigan become more business friendly (tax wise) across the board? Sure, let's do it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...

Sorry but I am underwhelmed about this news. Another call center, whoopee for those $10/hour jobs selling insurance to unemployed Michiganians. Now Farmers also owns Foremost Insurance I wonder if they will put the two under the same roof?

Speaking of tax breaks, did Priceline ever get up and running with their 5 million tax break call center?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.