Jump to content

Division / Wealthy and ICCF


MiGuyz

Recommended Posts

Yeah, I think the hopes for a Trader Joe's or Whole Foods are a pipedream. The only thing I could possibly see (total speculation) besides a Save-A-Lot type grocer would be if Meijer did something, used it as a prototype for smaller urban stores and as a "community service". They use the Meijer in Cascase as a prototype, why not Wealthy and Division for the smaller format urban stores that they are starting to build. As with all of my posts tonight, pure speculation and probably not going to happen. :)

Joe

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Yesterday as I was driving north on Division, I noticed them clearing out another block.

It is the block just south of the Wealthy corner...bounded by Buckley, Division, Logan and Sheldon.

I looked on the ICCF site but coould not find out what is going there.

Anyone know? Phase 2?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem with any type of traditional grocer, even in a smaller format, might be parking. I know we don't like to hear the evil "p" word, but this particular area really is not all that walkable in its present condition. Now, as long as we're talking pipedreams, Meijer could do a real community service and buy up everything on Division they can get their hands on and re-do the whole mess, including relocation of the shelters elsewhere. This used to be a hoppin' corridor, and probably could be again. With a massive plan like that, I stand convinced there could be a huge profit potential, but the logistics of it are mindboggling (barring a Kelo v City of New London eminent domain land-grab). ICCF is a start, but long term, you're just not going to rebuild much with subsidized housing.

Yeah, I think the hopes for a Trader Joe's or Whole Foods are a pipedream. The only thing I could possibly see (total speculation) besides a Save-A-Lot type grocer would be if Meijer did something, used it as a prototype for smaller urban stores and as a "community service".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Interesting they are clearing parcel C. Are they waiting on A because the whole idea of a grocery store is not final?

Anyone remember what is in parcel C...retail?

I hear that this is going to be a school.

Edited by uncus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oooooooooooo....ouch.

That is not what I was hoping for. In fact it looks straight out of the 70s. Huge blank walls all over the place! It looks like they used the same intern that designed the Archdiocese up the street.

This was honestly the best they could do with 9.2 million? There is no building materials in existence that can make this thing look good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Jeff and Joe. It does look like a school, and I think it could turn out either great or terrible -- probably not at all in between. I'll reserve judgement until I see materials and execution. (If brick is used in any part, those brick panels that have become popular will absolutely kill it. I hate seeing visible separations between whole areas of brick.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Jeff and Joe. It does look like a school, and I think it could turn out either great or terrible -- probably not at all in between. I'll reserve judgement until I see materials and execution. (If brick is used in any part, those brick panels that have become popular will absolutely kill it. I hate seeing visible separations between whole areas of brick.)

I guess I don't really see how it could turn out great- while cool looking, it appears extremely suburban to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmm. I don't see that at all. Modern doesn't equal suburban. Unfortunately, renderings usually look stiff, stark and show no sense of place. I absolutely hated the Art Museum as it went up- now I love it. I can't wait to see how this takes shape (I'm optimistic that it'll be a winner).

Joe

I guess I don't really see how it could turn out great- while cool looking, it appears extremely suburban to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there is one thing I don't like. The massing is mostly on the side-street perpendicular to Division, whereas the Division-facing side is rather low. Each time I look at the rendering, I visualise Division having the side with the trees -- it feels natural that way -- but I have to remind myself otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, there is one thing I don't like. The massing is mostly on the side-street perpendicular to Division, whereas the Division-facing side is rather low. Each time I look at the rendering, I visualise Division having the side with the trees -- it feels natural that way -- but I have to remind myself otherwise.

There's a vacant lot fronting Division. The almost-completed section is a block away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.