Jump to content

Downtown Orlando Project Discussion


sunshine

Recommended Posts


Thornton Park/Eola needs a lot of help. It has been lapped by Mills, Ivanhoe, and Milk Districts. Washington has a bunch of empty buildings (Graffiti landlords are going to have trouble with that one, they are asking new tenant to pay for the outside space as part of the lease and it will sit til they change on that or an idiot agrees to that), Spice will finally be closing (this is a huge opportunity for a good restaurant group to do something great there), 420 and the Sanctuary/101 retail area continue to sit mostly empty, Central/Summerling building has 2 big vacancies, and more inventory will be added with Modera and Citi. I'm hearing another big restaurant in the area might be closing too. 
Mostly a landlord issue, all the tenants in Post/Paramount are doing good business. If rents were lower like the other areas we'd see them full and more interesting concepts move in.

I won't be upset to see Spice leave (other than some good people losing their jobs). That prime space has been squandered for too long by a mediocre product.

I will say Stubborn Mule has brought a little life back to the Sanctuary block in South Eola. Sitting on the patio there with Mucho across the street and Oudom a few doors down, it almost feels bustling from the late afternoons onward.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like it I just don't understand why the city keeps calling the project a "pedestrian bridge."    Is it not s part of the urban trail?   Why not go with the wording that sounds like positive cycling /recreational infrastructure instead of the one that sounds like a band aid on a stroad?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/9/2017 at 0:03 PM, popsiclebrandon said:

Thornton Park/Eola needs a lot of help. It has been lapped by Mills, Ivanhoe, and Milk Districts. Washington has a bunch of empty buildings (Graffiti landlords are going to have trouble with that one, they are asking new tenant to pay for the outside space as part of the lease and it will sit til they change on that or an idiot agrees to that), Spice will finally be closing (this is a huge opportunity for a good restaurant group to do something great there), 420 and the Sanctuary/101 retail area continue to sit mostly empty, Central/Summerling building has 2 big vacancies, and more inventory will be added with Modera and Citi. I'm hearing another big restaurant in the area might be closing too. 

Mostly a landlord issue, all the tenants in Post/Paramount are doing good business. If rents were lower like the other areas we'd see them full and more interesting concepts move in.

I don't know much about commercial real estate, but it seems counter-intuitive to price commercial tenants out of a lease vs lowering the rent to something affordable that allows tenants to stay long term & contribute to the community. Do commercial landlords get to claim vacant property as a loss/write-off or something? How are they making money??

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, prahaboheme said:

Anyone else feel as if this bridge design is a bit over the top at this location? I tend to prefer minimalist concrete bridges in urban locations rather than statement pieces (especially an all too played out suspension bridge).  

 

I seem to recall a similar sentiment having been opined about around here a while back.... 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On ‎3‎/‎11‎/‎2017 at 5:22 PM, prahaboheme said:

Anyone else feel as if this bridge design is a bit over the top at this location? I tend to prefer minimalist concrete bridges in urban locations rather than statement pieces (especially an all too played out suspension bridge).  

 

NOPE

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/11/2017 at 10:06 PM, nite owℓ said:

I don't know much about commercial real estate, but it seems counter-intuitive to price commercial tenants out of a lease vs lowering the rent to something affordable that allows tenants to stay long term & contribute to the community. Do commercial landlords get to claim vacant property as a loss/write-off or something? How are they making money??

I've had it explained to me that a lot of buildings have mortgages on them and in those documents the banks have set minimum rates that can be accepted. So the bank says nothing under $30 a foot, and the landlord is stuck. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, JFW657 said:

I didn't know that.

Have often wondered the same thing.

Yeah seems like it would be an issue if they stop making payments because they can't get tenants but I'm told it isn't usually an issue as it is set below market at time of contract but there was a ton of empty inventory after the recession from buildings done during the boom when market was much higher.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, popsiclebrandon said:

I've had it explained to me that a lot of buildings have mortgages on them and in those documents the banks have set minimum rates that can be accepted. So the bank says nothing under $30 a foot, and the landlord is stuck. 

Everyone has their reasons. For existing buildings, it could be an inflated sense of value. For new buildings, the cost of TI might not cover the lower rent in the short run. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/13/2017 at 0:13 PM, popsiclebrandon said:

I've had it explained to me that a lot of buildings have mortgages on them and in those documents the banks have set minimum rates that can be accepted. So the bank says nothing under $30 a foot, and the landlord is stuck. 

True in some cases, more common in office buildings and larger shopping centers than in smaller-scale developments like what are being discussed here.  With respect to retail space in multifamily projects a la 420 many lenders don't even consider any income from the retail space at all (or severely discount it) when doing their underwriting since that income is historically very unreliable.   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Updates from growthspotter on the former AT&T building at Orange and Amelia...

- Construction could begin this fall (plans filed with city in next 30 days)

- Complete exterior reno mostly glass

- addition of 200 space parking deck

- Adding 10,000 sq ft ground level retail

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.