Jump to content

Downtown Orlando Project Discussion


sunshine

Recommended Posts


18 hours ago, AmIReal said:

I assume most everyone has already looked at this overview of 1st half of 2018 developments- http://www.downtownorlando.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/DevelopmentProfile1stHalf2018_R8.pdf

but some might have missed the 2nd half version- http://online.fliphtml5.com/gydm/szxq/#p=1

I've seen both of these before and find it odd that when we're not being marketed as Thornton Park by the DDB, all the projects listed here call South Eola "Planning Area: Eola Heights" or simply "Planning Area: Eola" as if South Eola is that which must not be named.

I would say I understand if the Eola/Eola Heights planning area is something large that overlaps South Eola but projects in Eola Heights like Fountain Vu5 are actually listed as "Planning Area: Eola Height Historic District" so either the DDB is just all over the place with how they choose to refer to things (and never acknowledge South Eola exists) or I'm missing something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, W7edwin said:

was flipping through that PDF and saw the Residence Inn page.. im still mad that Mamas Subs didn't budge.. that corner is tainted forever 

Too bad RI (or whoever owns the property) didn't buy up MB's when they finally did sell, then demo the old MB building and extend the hotel. If nothing else, they could've built a really nice atrium lobby, retail and conference area.

Guess the money just wasn't right.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, spenser1058 said:

We can start a Rogues' Gallery of the spots that messed up someone's plans for real estate glory:

• L.U.S.T Cash Transactors 

• Mama B's

• The Church of No Soccer Here (not sure of the actual name)

I'm sure there are others.

 

126554A5-2C61-4876-99D7-BAB563AA5D59.jpeg

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think the city should rethink acorn lights on major thoroughfares like Colonial. They look good in the neighborhoods, around lakes and in historic districts, however with a street as wide as Colonial (about as wide as Wilshire Blvd in LA), I think they need to consider taller, less “cutesy” streetscaping.

Likely not a priority for the city, but food for thought. It’s often the small details that leave a lasting impression on people’s views of an urban space.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.