Jump to content

Scaleybark Station Area Projects


kermit

Recommended Posts


6 hours ago, go_vertical said:

I'm just glad to finally see development on that side of South.  The only improvements on the east side of the street south of The Waterman has been Carvana and it has looked so unbalanced for a while.  Now we have phase two of Sedgefield, this replacing the arcade, and hopefully the Zack's apartments gets going soon. 

What about Lidl?  When’s that happening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, improvements isn't the best word choice there.  I should have said recent construction. 

I have no clue why Lidl's feet never warmed up to that location.  I would think opening up shop there would be a hit for the area.  They bought the land right?  I feel like I vaguely remember there being a soil remediation issue, but I may be wrong about that. 

Edited by go_vertical
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, go_vertical said:

Yeah, improvements isn't the best word choice there.  I should have said recent construction. 

I have no clue why Lidl's feet never warmed up to that location.  I would think opening up shop there would be a hit for the area.  They bought the land right?  I feel like I vaguely remember there being a soil remediation issue, but I may be wrong about that. 

Soil contamination was indeed the issue. I'd bet that construction starts in 2022 though. It looks slightly different there now and the location would kill. I suspect we will see this start in the near future but I'm NOT in the know. They certainly could make a ton on the land if they decided to flip it though...

Edited by JBS
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, stang_esq said:

Don't forget the renovated building that looks to be a future restaurant space just to the left (north) of Ski Country Sports.  Sorry for bad pic.  I can't bend far enough over my balcony to get a shot from home office and don't feel like walking down there at the moment.  So I found an old pic with the building sorta in view.

 

Regarding the big lot at Loso Station, my buddy who works at Beacon says the big building dropped from the conversation.  Nothing is currently underway on that project.  Plus, there is an Edifice construction trailer sitting within the fenced area of that lot, and Edifice is the contractor building Loso Station Buildings 3 & 4, which are currently underway.  Both will be 5 story office buildings with something like 25k sqft of retail on bottom floor.  

Based on  a rough calculation, the immediate area surrounding the Scaleybark station will have the following *new* retail square footage:

Loso Station 1:  5,000 sqft (Land of a Thousand Hills Coffee)

Loso Station 3 & 4:  25,000 sqft

Loso Village:  50,000 sqft (https://beacondevelopment.com/properties/business-park/4816/loso-village)

(Not sure if Loso Village includes the Urban Mvmt building, but I don't think so.)

Weathered Souls Brewing (currently Urban Mvmt):  10,000 sqft

South & Hollis:  9,000 sqft 

The Restaurant Building in photo:  Guessing around 5-7,000 sqft

Northwood Ravin:  No idea

That's roughly 100,000 sqft of *new* retail not including Northwood Ravin.  I'm thinking that will make Loso more of a retail/restaurant node than the New Bern Station area of Southend.

IMG_A75477EE5C63-1.jpeg

Vanguard :-( 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cool video.  If I understand correctly, the owner of the Protagonist building now has plans for expansion into office space for the rear portion of that building.  Is that what he meant?  Loso has a bright near-term future (2-3 years), but I hate to hear so many comments about the wealth of parking, parking to square footage ratios, etc.  Then in the next sentence he talked about the new density in Loso, which doesn't really combine well with lots of parking.  I should also point out that it's all surface parking except for the new apartment buildings.  I'm really hoping to see some of that surface parking disappear so that we can enjoy more density, more walkability, and more safety since there won't be as many cars motoring around looking for spots.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, stang_esq said:

Cool video.  If I understand correctly, the owner of the Protagonist building now has plans for expansion into office space for the rear portion of that building.  Is that what he meant?  Loso has a bright near-term future (2-3 years), but I hate to hear so many comments about the wealth of parking, parking to square footage ratios, etc.  Then in the next sentence he talked about the new density in Loso, which doesn't really combine well with lots of parking.  I should also point out that it's all surface parking except for the new apartment buildings.  I'm really hoping to see some of that surface parking disappear so that we can enjoy more density, more walkability, and more safety since there won't be as many cars motoring around looking for spots.  

Just my opinion but, based on the distance to Uptown and the access to major city thoroughfares, having cars and surface parking here is not unreasonable. I think that's a big part of the appeal. I view this area as similar to West Charlotte. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, JBS said:

Just my opinion but, based on the distance to Uptown and the access to major city thoroughfares, having cars and surface parking here is not unreasonable. I think that's a big part of the appeal. I view this area as similar to West Charlotte. 

Maybe so.  It's certainly a necessary evil for the time being.  In the next 2-3 years, I see a few thousand apartment units coming online, along with a few hundred more semi-dense (townhouse) residential developments.  Then there's the Scaleybark Station and adjacent semi-dense node encompassing Loso Station, Loso Village, Platform, and eventually some stuff across South Blvd.  I envision Loso as becoming the next node down the Blue Line.  You have the primary Southend node running from the Bland Station down to Tremont.  Then New Bern is kinda a node.  But Loso will eventually become more significant.  Parking will always be there, of course.  But it has the potential to be a cool walkable neighborhood if we can avoid the temptation to provide parking for everyone, and instead encourage people to get there by other means or just live there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, stang_esq said:

Maybe so.  It's certainly a necessary evil for the time being.  In the next 2-3 years, I see a few thousand apartment units coming online, along with a few hundred more semi-dense (townhouse) residential developments.  Then there's the Scaleybark Station and adjacent semi-dense node encompassing Loso Station, Loso Village, Platform, and eventually some stuff across South Blvd.  I envision Loso as becoming the next node down the Blue Line.  You have the primary Southend node running from the Bland Station down to Tremont.  Then New Bern is kinda a node.  But Loso will eventually become more significant.  Parking will always be there, of course.  But it has the potential to be a cool walkable neighborhood if we can avoid the temptation to provide parking for everyone, and instead encourage people to get there by other means or just live there.

I hope Charlotte’s density strategy doesn’t only mean acquiring small-footprint home ownership plats in center city, consolidating them, and then building mid-rise and high-rise rentals-only? 

Also:

Density + Car-Reliant Culture = Nightmare

i don’t really see Charlotte or much of America waging an effective campaign against a culture of car-reliance…

battling against that culture means changing attitudes and assumptions en masse about car dependency…

our density strategy can’t just be to densify to the point where our roads are dysfunctional and people are sort of forced onto transit, no?

Edited by RANYC
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ After seeing the renderings for the 110 East podium monstrosity I sorta feel like surface parking may be a better option for intown Charlotte hoods than structures. Surface parking has the virtue of easy convertability into something useful. With parking structures we are pretty much stuck with that car dependence for the life of the building. None of this changes the irony that Southend (and LoSo) are attractive places for these sorts of projects because of their walkability, developers flock to these places and do severe damage to that neighborhood character. The developers generally don't care since they rarely hold projects for long, but they certainly leave the city fuvked. 

 

1 hour ago, RANYC said:

our density strategy can’t just be to densify to the point where our roads are dysfunctional and people are sort of forced onto transit, no?

This is certainly the strategy we are perusing, and it is really the only viable reduce driving strategy we have in our current system -- its impossible to increase road capacity enough to avoid congestion and we lack any other sticks (other than making congestion worse) to force people onto transit.

Edited by kermit
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kermit said:

^ After seeing the renderings for the 110 East podium monstrosity I sorta feel like surface parking may be a better option for intown Charlotte hoods than structures. Surface parking capacity can at least be easily converted into a useful space as demand requires. With parking structures we are pretty much stuck with that car dependence for the life of the building. None of this changes the irony that Southend (and LoSo) are attractive places for these sorts of projects because of their walkability, developers flock to these places and do severe damage to that neighborhood character. The developers generally don't care since they rarely hold projects for long, but they certainly leave the city fuvked. 

 

  This is certainly the strategy we are perusing. It kinda must work this way in our current system -- its impossible to increase road capacity enough to avoid congestion and we lack any other sticks (other than making congestion worse) to force people onto transit.

Imagine if South End had just densified with low-rise and mixed-use brownstones (think Beacon Hill, Boston) and similar structures.    

Walkable density shouldn't have to immediately default to mid-rises and high-rises, but it often does these days.  Perhaps this is what happens when the city waits on developers to give an area decent sidewalks and streetscape.

Edited by RANYC
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, kermit said:

its impossible to increase road capacity enough to avoid congestion and we lack any other sticks (other than making congestion worse) to force people onto transit.

Maybe use carrots instead? Free Blue Line to go with the free Gold Line? Imagine what Uptown and SE would look like if they didn't have to build massive parking decks with every project. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

CMS has the old Colinswood land off of Scaleybark up for sale/lease. Does anyone know if there are any plans for this land yet?  Would hate to see something too dense especially since it’s surrounded by SFR. 
 

https://www.cms.k12.nc.us/cmsdepartments/construction/facilityplanning/Pages/PID-14909432---Scaleybark-Road-Surplus.aspx

  • Like 4
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.