Jump to content

Greenville Annexations

vicupstate

By vicupstate
in Greenville

 Share

Recommended Posts


  • Replies 315
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

ausrutherford
ausrutherford

If any of you live adjacent or your neighborhood is adjacent to the City limits and you wish to annex, feel free to contact me at [email protected]. Benefits to annexation can be found

vicupstate
vicupstate

From 1849 until 1960 the Charleston city limits had not changed. The city was 8 sq miles and did not extend off of the peninsula. J. Palmer Gaillard was elected Mayor in late 1959 on a platform to gro

GvilleSC
GvilleSC

Indeed. I think the City will absolutely see benefits from the nodes and corridors strategy. In a way, we are already seeing the benefits, just without an official named policy on the books. The green

Posted Images

gman430 Megalopolis

gman430

Posted
Posted

Looks like the Cherrydale Crossings shopping center is going to be annexed into the city: http://www.greenvillesc.gov/PlanningZoning/PlanningApplications/Applications/2012/MARCH/PlanningCommission/03-8-2012/AX-03-2012-2541NorthPleasantburgDrive.pdf If nothing else, this should give the city additional tax revenue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
vicupstate Metropolitan Area

vicupstate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Excellent news.

Between Property taxes, Business License fees, Sunday Liquor sales licenses, and Prepared Food taxes, it will be a nice payday for the city. Additional expenses to the city should be minimal.

It also brings the city limits contiguous to Montebello, in case the city were to pursue that option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 1 month later...
RiverWalker Whistle-Stop

RiverWalker

Posted
Posted

With its annexation of the new Tavern 24 (formerly Fatz), along with a 10-foot-wide strip of Woodruff Rd. extending eastward to the Interstate 385 interchange, the City of Mauldin may have effectively slammed the door on the City of Greenville in the growing eastside district. Greenville could have annexed the Tavern 24 property - it is contiguous to the Lieu's Chinese Bistro property, which is already incorporated within the Greenville city limits - but apparently Mauldin got there first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
apaladin Burg

apaladin

Posted
Posted

With its annexation of the new Tavern 24 (formerly Fatz), along with a 10-foot-wide strip of Woodruff Rd. extending eastward to the Interstate 385 interchange, the City of Mauldin may have effectively slammed the door on the City of Greenville in the growing eastside district. Greenville could have annexed the Tavern 24 property - it is contiguous to the Lieu's Chinese Bistro property, which is already incorporated within the Greenville city limits - but apparently Mauldin got there first.

FYI-Already mentioned and discussed on a couple of other threads. :good:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
johnpro318 Hamlet

johnpro318

Posted
Posted

FYI-Already mentioned and discussed on a couple of other threads. :good:

With its annexation of the new Tavern 24 (formerly Fatz), along with a 10-foot-wide strip of Woodruff Rd. extending eastward to the Interstate 385 interchange, the City of Mauldin may have effectively slammed the door on the City of Greenville in the growing eastside district. Greenville could have annexed the Tavern 24 property - it is contiguous to the Lieu's Chinese Bistro property, which is already incorporated within the Greenville city limits - but apparently Mauldin got there first.

Greenville should have got with the program and annexed much of this land a loooooong time ago. I'm not sure of the exact annexation laws so that may be partly to blame, but these developments have been built for many years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
vicupstate Metropolitan Area

vicupstate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I don't know the particulars, but my guess is Greenville tried to take in FATZ but they opted to go with Mauldin, mostly likely due to lower taxes/fees. That would be an educated guesss, but a guess.

I don't see this annexation by Mauldin on the GIS maps for the county, (possibly too soon to be updated). Depending on exactly where the line goes would determine if Greeenville is checkmated out of going further down Woodruff Rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 4 weeks later...
RiverWalker Whistle-Stop

RiverWalker

Posted
Posted

I don't know the particulars, but my guess is Greenville tried to take in FATZ but they opted to go with Mauldin, mostly likely due to lower taxes/fees. That would be an educated guesss, but a guess.

I don't see this annexation by Mauldin on the GIS maps for the county, (possibly too soon to be updated). Depending on exactly where the line goes would determine if Greeenville is checkmated out of going further down Woodruff Rd.

Regarding the reasons for Fatz deciding to go with Mauldin, I had speculated as much on other forums, but seeing as how I've already been taken to task for repeating what I had posted in other forums (despite being relevant to this forum), it's probably a good thing I hadn't elaborated further here. Sheesh.Anyway, the GCGIS internet map has been updated and shows the Mauldin annexation going right up to the off ramp of the interchange. I had thought that the city couldn't simply cross I-385 without following a right of way, but apparently I was mistaken, as that appears to be exactly what Greenville did when it annexed the properties flanking Independence Pt., off Independence Dr., just north of the Roper Mtn. interchange. So, it will be interesting to see what future annexations develop along the Woodruff Rd. corridor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
johnpro318 Hamlet

johnpro318

Posted
Posted

Regarding the reasons for Fatz deciding to go with Mauldin, I had speculated as much on other forums, but seeing as how I've already been taken to task for repeating what I had posted in other forums (despite being relevant to this forum), it's probably a good thing I hadn't elaborated further here. Sheesh.Anyway, the GCGIS internet map has been updated and shows the Mauldin annexation going right up to the off ramp of the interchange. I had thought that the city couldn't simply cross I-385 without following a right of way, but apparently I was mistaken, as that appears to be exactly what Greenville did when it annexed the properties flanking Independence Pt., off Independence Dr., just north of the Roper Mtn. interchange. So, it will be interesting to see what future annexations develop along the Woodruff Rd. corridor.

It's going to be a patchwork quilt around there for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
vicupstate Metropolitan Area

vicupstate

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Planning commission will take up two annexations in August

  • 1.28 acres at 1 Commercial Drive. This reduces a Laurens Rd area doughnut hole.
  • 9 acres to the Legacy Charter Schoola located at W. Washington and E. Bramlett Rd.

These annexations go to City Council tonight, and with public ROW, the Legacy Charter one will actually be 11.5 acres.

Also, the McDonalds on Woodruff Road by Magnolia Park is being annexed as well. It is just over 1 acre. This eliminates a doughnut hole :thumbsup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
  • 4 weeks later...
GvilleSC Megalopolis

GvilleSC

Posted
Posted

The Woodside Mill in West Greenville on Woodside Ave. is getting annexed. Just over 14 acres involved. It will get a Mills Mill type conversion. It will be apartments, at least initially.

http://www.greenvill...tMainStreet.pdf

This is great to see! I'm glad it's being saved before it meets the fate of so many other mills in the Upstate-- fire.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.