Jump to content

Nashville Bits and Pieces


smeagolsfree

Recommended Posts


13 minutes ago, UTgrad09 said:

Here's a figure for you: 3,969. That's the number of housing units approved for the Nashville metro in January and February 2016. 

Here are the metros ahead of that figure:

Dallas - 7,205

Houston - 6,942

Atlanta - 6,628

New York - 4,954

Los Angeles - 4,582

Phoenix - 4,019

Nashville - 3,969

 

 

That is just sick!!! :tw_astonished:

All those cities have Metro areas more than two to nine times Nashville's metro area size. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those housing numbers are crazy.

This puts us on pace to have ~24,000 units completed for this year of that pace is maintained. The Census bureau projected us at a ~+37,000 in population from July, 2014 to July, 2015 with 14,944 housing starts in 2014 and 17,810 in 2015 (average of 16,377).  That would be roughly 2.35 people per additional housing unit.  If that 24,000 number turns out to be be a reality, then using an average of 2015 and 2016 housing starts (average of 20,905) would put us ~+49,000 for July, 2016.

There's lots of speculation and "if's" in that line of thinking, but it is clear that Nashville's growth is actually speeding up.  We're going to be really close to 2,000,000 in the metro area (assuming no changes in definitions of the MSA) for the 2020 census if the census estimates are to be believed. Additional growth above what we've seen is big step to getting us above that 2,000,000 mark, especially if there's an economic slow down that stifles domestic migration.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hey_Hey said:

Those housing numbers are crazy.

This puts us on pace to have ~24,000 units completed for this year of that pace is maintained. The Census bureau projected us at a ~+37,000 in population from July, 2014 to July, 2015 with 14,944 housing starts in 2014 and 17,810 in 2015 (average of 16,377).  That would be roughly 2.35 people per additional housing unit.  If that 24,000 number turns out to be be a reality, then using an average of 2015 and 2016 housing starts (average of 20,905) would put us ~+49,000 for July, 2016.

There's lots of speculation and "if's" in that line of thinking, but it is clear that Nashville's growth is actually speeding up.  We're going to be really close to 2,000,000 in the metro area (assuming no changes in definitions of the MSA) for the 2020 census if the census estimates are to be believed. Additional growth above what we've seen is big step to getting us above that 2,000,000 mark, especially if there's an economic slow down that stifles domestic migration.

My estimations put us just at 2 million (2,001,228). But that does not take the acceleration into account (2,012,653 for sustained 2015 growth). If it truly accelerates, we could see 350k+ per decade growth.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

New TIF rules.

In addition the bill mandates that all future redevelopment district plans, as well as changes to existing plans, require that revenue from land sold by MDHA be used solely within that same redevelopment district.

http://www.tennessean.com/story/news/local/2016/04/05/nashville-metro-council-approves-new-rules-development-incentives/82665990/

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, PHofKS said:

Had to put these numbers in a graphical format...and compare to Metro Area populations...

 

:tw_glasses:

Proposed housing units in the same ballpark and NYC and LA?? That is remarkable.:tw_grin:

Edited by claya91
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nashville area office vacancy rates drop to an all-time low of 6.5%.  We REALLY need to have some developers and investors step up and create a large tower (or two) downtown.  There is simply too much demand compared to availability.

http://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/20493119/office-vacancy-rates-to-drop-to-recordlow-65

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, markhollin said:

Nashville area office vacancy rates drop to an all-time low of 6.5%.  We REALLY need to have some developers and investors step up and create a large tower (or two) downtown.  There is simply too much demand compared to availability.

http://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/20493119/office-vacancy-rates-to-drop-to-recordlow-65

*cough* Turnberry *cough*

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, markhollin said:

Nashville area office vacancy rates drop to an all-time low of 6.5%.  We REALLY need to have some developers and investors step up and create a large tower (or two) downtown.  There is simply too much demand compared to availability.

http://www.nashvillepost.com/business/development/article/20493119/office-vacancy-rates-to-drop-to-recordlow-65

What's unfortunate for us now is that if this were the '80s, with the current economic dynamics downtown, we'd already have our 40 and 50-story skyscrapers with more on the way. We'd have had Nashville City Center II, which would've broken the 500-foot barrier (of occupied space at that level, not just the adornment of "Batman"). At least in the '80s, they "went big" and would not have thrown up so many of the mediocre shorties we've seen (with even more mediocre designs, for which this decade is going to be renowned for in our city). We ought to be already tearing down the Hampton Inn at 4th & KVB and the ghastly adjacent Hyatt Place and replacing both with something appropriately majestic and attractive.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^ True, but there are few buildings built during that timeframe that I would want rising above Nashville's skyline today. But I suppose we could be saying the same thing about today's under-construction buildings in 20-30 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The 1980s boom saw mostly the biggest cities get truly stunning designs back then. Dallas pretty much cashed in that decade and also cashed out before the decade was even 2/3 over. There has been one single skyscraper there, Museum Tower, to break the 500ft barrier since the 1980s boom, and that's just sad. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, VSRJ said:

^ True, but there are few buildings built during that timeframe that I would want rising above Nashville's skyline today. But I suppose we could be saying the same thing about today's under-construction buildings in 20-30 years.

I wouldn't have to wait 20-30 years to make that declaration about the present orgy of unimaginative glass boxes. <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Workforce housing project in 12 South. Metro land. Private developer. 110 units.

http://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/blog/2016/04/nashville-developer-mayor-barry-pursue-lower-price.html

I like the idea. We need affordable housing so our city can grow (employees have to be able to afford to live here)

Why doesn't Metro buy huge parcels and let private developers do this on streets like Murfreesboro Pike and Nolensville Rd. You can buy huge tracts of land for reasonable prices per sf. Metro bought some serious acreage for the Family Justice Center/New Precinct on Murfreesboro I think for a very affordable price. And this area is so close to downtown, it would be very attractive to renters who work in our core.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, chris holman said:

From The Tennessean

Korean tire maker plans North American headquarters in Nashville

http://tnne.ws/1N7tOpX

 

Hopefully the company looks for downtown location

Didn't Smeags say recently that the governor requested 30 million for a secret project?

If it's tied to this tire maker's headquarters, wouldn't that amount imply possibly a new downtown tower?

Edit: nevermind. just read info in the accolades thread. if only 100 employees in Wayne NJ are moving, probably not a downtown tower

Edited by nashwatcher
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.