Jump to content

Nashville Bits and Pieces


smeagolsfree

Recommended Posts

Interesting rumors about One KVB "if" true. 

1. They paid 9.4 million dollars for the land to build it on.

2. It looks like they have some floors pre-leased.

3. The land is a very odd shaped that only seems like a fit for the building they want to build.

4. The land is hemmed in by 7th Ave, KVB, and Lafayette as well as a police station and the 6th & Peabody complex.

If they want to sell the land, would there be any takers for such odd parcels?  It looks like only an L or V shaped building will go there. If they don't sell the land, it seems unlikely for any business to just eat 9.4 million dollars. Would they change over from office to residential or hotel? Who knows.

Edited by Ingram
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites


I think that is a good price to pay if they want to land bank it for a while.

Where do you see they have leased space???? I have not heard any leases being made public. I think they could change to residential/hotel/office/retail/parking/ whatever else they can do to make it work, but the sources I have heard from on multiple levels are not sounding good. Been hearing this for a while now too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John Eldridge III, founder of E3 Construction Services, did a Q&A regarding new affordable housing construction in Nashville.  Here are some highlights:

You cannot build affordable housing in the urban core. False. Anything is possible. However, it would be more achievable if there were partnership opportunities available with the city in regard to their existing land.

Developers don’t want to build affordable housing because the margins are too small. False. Both my group and several of my colleagues are actively looking for opportunities that make both financial sense and can make responsible community advancement. 

For-profit private developers don’t use Metro resources enough to build affordable housing. False. Developers don’t use Metro resources because the process is innavigable as it stands.

Where do you see the upper limit for home prices in order to still be considered affordable housing? How has this benchmark moved over the past 5-7 years? The upper limit for homes is hard to define because it directly correlates to the average salary in Nashville, which is constantly in flux. Currently, we’re seeing people from other cities move to town and drive up the average cost of living, demand for housing as well as affect the definition of “affordable.” We aim to price our workforce housing units for teachers, first responders and the people who keep our city running which is typically in that $40,000-$60,000 salary range.

More behind the NBJ paywall here:

https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2019/09/10/q-a-how-this-developer-looks-at-affordable-housing.html?iana=hpmvp_nsh_news_headline

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, markhollin said:

John Eldridge III, founder of E3 Construction Services, did a Q&A regarding new affordable housing construction in Nashville.  Here are some highlights:

You cannot build affordable housing in the urban core. False. Anything is possible. However, it would be more achievable if there were partnership opportunities available with the city in regard to their existing land.

Developers don’t want to build affordable housing because the margins are too small. False. Both my group and several of my colleagues are actively looking for opportunities that make both financial sense and can make responsible community advancement. 

For-profit private developers don’t use Metro resources enough to build affordable housing. False. Developers don’t use Metro resources because the process is innavigable as it stands.

Where do you see the upper limit for home prices in order to still be considered affordable housing? How has this benchmark moved over the past 5-7 years? The upper limit for homes is hard to define because it directly correlates to the average salary in Nashville, which is constantly in flux. Currently, we’re seeing people from other cities move to town and drive up the average cost of living, demand for housing as well as affect the definition of “affordable.” We aim to price our workforce housing units for teachers, first responders and the people who keep our city running which is typically in that $40,000-$60,000 salary range.

More behind the NBJ paywall here:

https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2019/09/10/q-a-how-this-developer-looks-at-affordable-housing.html?iana=hpmvp_nsh_news_headline

If we could remove parking minimums from the equation, it would be much cheaper to build housing in the core. And if homebuyers aren't forced to subsidize parking for other residents, individual units would be cheaper to buy. I know that downtown doesn't have parking minimums, but clearly lenders are requiring it anyway. I don't know what the answer to this problem is, but housing won't get cheaper until it gets unbundled from parking

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/18/2019 at 9:45 PM, e-dub said:

Politicon is in Nashville this year, I had no idea.

 

https://politicon.com/

They've just announced the lineup today, and it will feature quite a few big names for anybody who even slightly follows politics. Among the speakers and panelists: former Sen. Al Franken, Sean Hannity, James Comey, Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Ann Coulter, Ana Navarro, Charlie Kirk, April Ryan, Donna Brazile, James Carville, Knoxville Mayor Glen Jacobs, Reince Priebus, Tomi Lahren, and more.

This will feature enough polarizing personalities to royally peev everybody on both sides of the political aisle, so I would assume there will be a lot of media in town to cover this circus. Dates are Oct. 26-27 at Music City Center.

GA tickets start at $49 per day if you're interested in going.

Edited by Jamie Hall
  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, markhollin said:

John Eldridge III, founder of E3 Construction Services, did a Q&A regarding new affordable housing construction in Nashville.  Here are some highlights:

You cannot build affordable housing in the urban core. False. Anything is possible. However, it would be more achievable if there were partnership opportunities available with the city in regard to their existing land.

Developers don’t want to build affordable housing because the margins are too small. False. Both my group and several of my colleagues are actively looking for opportunities that make both financial sense and can make responsible community advancement. 

For-profit private developers don’t use Metro resources enough to build affordable housing. False. Developers don’t use Metro resources because the process is innavigable as it stands.

Where do you see the upper limit for home prices in order to still be considered affordable housing? How has this benchmark moved over the past 5-7 years? The upper limit for homes is hard to define because it directly correlates to the average salary in Nashville, which is constantly in flux. Currently, we’re seeing people from other cities move to town and drive up the average cost of living, demand for housing as well as affect the definition of “affordable.” We aim to price our workforce housing units for teachers, first responders and the people who keep our city running which is typically in that $40,000-$60,000 salary range.

More behind the NBJ paywall here:

https://www.bizjournals.com/nashville/news/2019/09/10/q-a-how-this-developer-looks-at-affordable-housing.html?iana=hpmvp_nsh_news_headline

I feel like all he did was answer the question without actually answering it. None of those responses makes it sound like affordable housing is actually in the pipeline

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bigeasy said:

I feel like all he did was answer the question without actually answering it. None of those responses makes it sound like affordable housing is actually in the pipeline

I agree. Of course I hope he's being genuine, but it's much easier to say "I would if not for the government" instead of "We'd rather make more money on less affordable developments". The question regarding margins in particular features a total non-answer that doesn't reassure me about anything. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, bigeasy said:

I feel like all he did was answer the question without actually answering it. None of those responses makes it sound like affordable housing is actually in the pipeline

Eldridge has affordable housing components in quite a few of the developments he is building around town, so he is practicing what he is preaching.

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, downtownresident said:

Anybody who is actually a local (which is most of you, I realize) want to provide some insight as to what this may mean for Nashville's growth and urban development in general?  I have heard mention on this website that Cooper is somewhat anti-development... I really hope that is not the case... a little balance is fine, but the last thing we need is for someone to put the breaks on this rocket ship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BnaBreaker said:

Anybody who is actually a local (which is most of you, I realize) want to provide some insight as to what this may mean for Nashville's growth and urban development in general?  I have heard mention on this website that Cooper is somewhat anti-development... I really hope that is not the case... a little balance is fine, but the last thing we need is for someone to put the breaks on this rocket ship.

I don’t expect any more corporate relocations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, BnaBreaker said:

Anybody who is actually a local (which is most of you, I realize) want to provide some insight as to what this may mean for Nashville's growth and urban development in general?  I have heard mention on this website that Cooper is somewhat anti-development... I really hope that is not the case... a little balance is fine, but the last thing we need is for someone to put the breaks on this rocket ship.

From reading his website, he seems to be anti giving additional incentives for development downtown, but open for using incentive funds elsewhere. His stance is that the incentives aren’t needed downtown, but could be needed in other areas of town.

The Paramount proposal is dead, unless Metro Council forces it through.

He seems to be for expanding bus service, and says he wants to have a transit proposal on the ballot within the first year.

I expect the state to do the heavy lifting in corporate relocations if we land any, and expect those to gravitate to Franklin/Williamson County. 

This is all assuming that he actually follows through on the rhetoric and proposals. 

Edited by downtownresident
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.