Jump to content

Tallest Buildings Never Built


Urbanrailfan

Recommended Posts

If you happen to have buildings in your city that were proposed a long time ago, but never got built, post them here and talk about it. Even if there happen to be those more than 1,000 feet tall! So far the only cities to have these talls are Los Angeles, Houston, Chicago, New York and Atlanta.

The Bank of the Southwest, Houston. 1,401 feet, 82 stories. I wish it was built; Houston would have kept the reputation of being the tallest west of the Mississippi - ever since LA's Library Tower stole the honor in 1990 with 1,018 from Houston's JP Morgan Chase at 1,002 feet. The BofSW Tower does have that resemblance to Philadelphia's Liberty Towers.

4bwst1.jpg

28houston-bankofthesouthwest.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites


  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

In Detroit, the tallest never built was the Book Tower. It would've been over 80 floors, and had it been built, it would still be the tallest building in the city. At the time it was proposed, it would've been the tallest building in the world. Unfortunately, the Depression killed any hopes of this project ever being built.

The shorter buildings behind the tower in the renderings are the Book Building and 36 story Book Tower, both of which still stand today.

booktower.jpg

Book2.jpg

The tower was designed by Detroit architect Louis Kamper, who also designed Broderick Tower, Park Avenue Hotel, Book Building, Book Tower, and Book-Cadillac Hotel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Book Tower was a nice proposal. I don't even want to guess what the office vacancy rate downtown right now would be if it had been built though. Vacancy rates are about 20%. Imagine adding 80+ floors of additional office space to the space that's already vacant in the CBD!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ironic thing about the mile high tower is that Frank Lloyd Wright hated cities. He was a proponent of what he called "Broadacre City". Basically his proposal involved giving every person in the country one acre of land on which to build a house that blended in with the landscape - one of his Usonian houses. Cities would be emptied out and demolished, returning them to a natural landscape. The Broadacre city proposal had main roads spaced one mile apart. I believe the proposal also called for putting monorail lines along all of the major roads. It is an insane proposal that fortunately never came to fruition. I don't think I could live in such an environment...I need big cities!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A few from Australia:

Grollo Tower first poposed in the latter-1990s, Grollo Tower Mark I - The Denton Corker Marshall proposal - a mixed use tower consisting of office levels and apartments with a beacon gracing its pinnacle. @ a total of 113 floors in the tower section. Its height to top of beacon was to be 1,837ft/560m.

It was to be the tallest building in the world @ the time of its proposal.

dcmgrollo2.jpg

dcmgrollo1.jpg

379dcmgrollotwer6.jpg

More info & pics @ DCM Grollo Tower

Sydney based architect Harry Seidler's poposal for Grollo Tower Mark II, proposed in the-mid 1990s and was to be 120 storeys:

seidlergrollotower3.jpg

seidlergrollotower4.jpg

______379seidlergrollotower5.jpg__grollo.jpg

One from a shelved project, Sydney. Once again a Harry Seidler known as CBD-1 - 115 levels 1,460ft/445m to tip:

pho_cbd1.jpg

An enlarged pic of the above @ CBD-1

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I like that one from Melbourne, and the second one from Sydney.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

If you mean the DCM proposal for Grollo Tower, yes it would have been fantastic if it had have gone through. Unfortunately the developers had disputes with Melbourne's Docklands Authorities and instead opted for the 977ft/298m Eureka Tower on the other side of town, now u/c..

(Fortunately I have a rather large booklet on the DCM proposal when it was being marketed in the late 90s. A collectors item :) )

It's interesting to note that both the Harry Seidler proposal for both the Grollo Tower & Sydney's CBD-1 have external cross-bracing.

Another one from Melbourne. It was a late 1980s design by architects Bates Smart & McCutcheon. It was to be 1968ft/600m and 150 levels above ground. It was to be known as The South Pacific Centre:

BatesSmart150.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

In Detroit, the tallest never built was the Book Tower.  It would've been over 80 floors, and had it been built, it would still be the tallest building in the city.  At the time it was proposed, it would've been the tallest building in the world.  Unfortunately, the Depression killed any hopes of this project ever being built.

The shorter buildings behind the tower in the renderings are the Book Building and 36 story Book Tower, both of which still stand today.

booktower.jpg

Book2.jpg

The tower was designed by Detroit architect Louis Kamper, who also designed Broderick Tower, Park Avenue Hotel, Book Building, Book Tower, and Book-Cadillac Hotel.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

It's really too bad that the book tower was never built. It would make the skyline look even better then it already does. Maybe after the city completes its revival, it will start doing other projects like this!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope you're right, Jonzo. I have to wonder though...what would Detroit be like today had the tower been built? Would this tower just be sitting half empty like so many other skyscrapers downtown? Or would this tower have been the start of a huge building boom, turning the Detroit as we know it today into a major center of commerce? It is a question that will never be answered, but it is interesting to think about.

BTW, welcome to the forum!! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have to wonder though...what would Detroit be like today had the tower been built?  Would this tower just be sitting half empty like so many other skyscrapers downtown? Or would this tower have been the start of a huge building boom, turning the Detroit as we know it today into a major center of commerce? 

Allan,

I'm afraid this tower, had it been built, would have suffered the same as many of the other buildings after the "Great Escape" to the suburbs in the 50's and beyond. Washington Blvd has suffered for decades now, I see no reason why this wouldn't have suffered along with it. It breaks my heart to see the Book Building with all of those antennas and satellite dishes up there. Whoever designed that gorgeous building no doubt has turn over in his grave now that it has been defaced with those gadgets.

On a brighter note, they appear to be moving lots of junk away from the Cadalliac Hotel this morning!

- BR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Now for Chi-Town.

SOM's proposal for mixed-use 7 South Dearborn. @ 108-storeys it was to reach exactly 2,000ft/610m to tips of its antennae.

7_south_context_website_309.jpg

More pics & info @ 7 South Dearborn

Another SOM proposal, Dearborn Center. 85 levels that was to reach 1,135ft/346m above ground:

37a5.98_dearborn_tower_1546.jpg__dearbornsunset_1547.jpg

Pics & info @ Dearborn Center

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I loved both those! Dearborn Center was awsome! Jin Mao is based off of it.

I like the Miglin-Beitler Skyneedle for Chicago. I think it was a Pelli design?

300mbs.gif0805b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Book Tower was a nice proposal.  I don't even want to guess what the office vacancy rate downtown right now would be if it had been built though.  Vacancy rates are about 20%.  Imagine adding 80+ floors of additional office space to the space that's already vacant in the CBD!

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

I want to comment on what I perceive as a major flaw with your speculation. Although you base your observation on the fatal reality reality of Detroit, the Book Tower could have significantly changed the downtown core increasing what is termed 'the critical mass' of the CDB built environment. Of course the reality is different, but if the Book Tower was built, it could have resulted in the construction of the subway proposed (and narrowly rejected) of the same decade, which in turn, may have cause addtional highrise construction. Certainly Chicago's CBD, and to some extent Cleveland's CBD, haven't suffered as that of Detroit.

With a wonderful river view, alternatives to driving, who knows if the suburban highrise cores would have the same appeal? Hudson's may still be open, and the city with the third largest collection of pre-war high rises would be a very different place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.