Jump to content

2nd Most Important or Favorite city in Midwest


monsoon

What is the Second most city in Midwest (assume Chicago #1, Texas not included)  

198 members have voted

  1. 1. What is the Second most city in Midwest (assume Chicago #1, Texas not included)

    • Kansas City
      9
    • Minneapolis
      58
    • Cleveland
      7
    • Columbus
      7
    • Cincinnati
      4
    • St. Louis
      19
    • Milwaukee
      6
    • Des Moines
      3
    • Indianapolis
      7
    • Detroit
      71
    • Other (explain)
      7


Recommended Posts


  • Replies 142
  • Created
  • Last Reply

When people refer to Chicago as America's second city it's because Chicago is a city, unlike LA.  I'm still interested in how "LA in many ways is more of a city then New York"?  You did say that, right?  I can't think of one way, let alone many.  As I've said before, San Fran is by FAR the best California city.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

From my visit, which was back in the mid 1990's, LA is very much a city and a dense one, at that. It may not have as much old time grit like Chicago or NYC, but, like Miami, it sure holds its own, in terms of overall density.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So back to the discussion at hand....I think Detroit is still the second city of the Midwest. Although down and out, from its previous highs, the Auto industry still packs a powerful puch. Other than that, I'd say the Twin Cities are right up there in that discussion too. That metro is defiantely an underrated and sometimes overlooked place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wait, you guys do know that "Second City" just doesn't refer to population but also refers to the quality of the cultural and infastructure qualities of a "Second City" right? Chicago, in many regards and probably overall, is still America's second city, and in some regards LA is.

As for the Midwest, the second most important city is kind of an ambigious question. While Minneapolis may be the most stable and most healthy, Detroit economically and culturally is still the second most important, whic really speaks to it's power especially after falling as far as it did.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

Actually America's "Second City" is Los Angeles.  Chicago is a distant third.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

That depends on what you mean by "LA" Chicago is a far bigger city than LA on it's own, but LA has a larger Metro. It's still a stretch to call Chicago a "Distant third" however! LA's urban core is nothing!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you could argue St. Louis and Minneapolis tie for the ranking. I also agree Detroit is important, but something must be done to improve the city's image or it's importance will slip. Back to STL and MSP...I actually think you could argue St. Louis is slightly more important than MSP. STL is home to a huge defense industry (BOEING), Edward Jones, AG Edwards, the world's largest brewery (ABusch), Express Scripts, just to name a few. The sports teams are great, the downtown is coming back at full force, just hosted the FINAL 4 and it went very well...and the momentum just keeps picking up. The weather is better than MSP...and if given a choice I think more people would choose warmer over colder (that's just a thought). St. Louis still has all 4 seasons, but winters are not nearly as extreme. Also, I know I'm going to get flack...but the St. Louis skyline is recognized world wide...MSP is not. Yes, MSP is impressive, but the Arch identifies STL to a world audience because of its landmark status. I like both city's but those are the reasons I'm picking St. Louis as 2nd most important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the numbers, I would say Detroit because of its population and media market size. Both are second only to Chicago in the Midwest. And don't forget Detroit's contribution to the music world in the 60's.

But you also have to remember that Detroit got so far ahead of the other cities because of the American auto industry. But that's what made DET's economy. They relied too much on that. And the auto industry ain't what it used to be. Like Midwest said, if DET and MI do little to nothing to change the perception of Detroit to the rest of the country, it's going to slip even further down. And its importance will sip as well. They need to get aggressive on fighting crime and work really hard to attract businesses and people to the city (the actual city of Detroit, that is)

Like you said, Midwest - St. Louis's downtown is coming back really strong and the employers you listed are quite diverse. I would personally like to check out St. Louis one of these days to see what's going on there. If DET continues to decline, STL, could easily swoop in and become the second most important city in the Midwest. For now, DET is second in importance, but not by much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the numbers, I would say Detroit because of its population and media market size. Both are second only to Chicago in the Midwest. And don't forget Detroit's contribution to the music world in the 60's.

But you also have to remember that Detroit got so far ahead of the other cities because of the American auto industry. But that's what made DET's economy. They relied too much on that. And the auto industry ain't what it used to be. Like Midwest said, if DET and MI do little to nothing to change the perception of Detroit to the rest of the country, it's going to slip even further down. And its importance will sip as well. They need to get aggressive on fighting crime and work really hard to attract businesses and people to the city (the actual city of Detroit, that is)

Like you said, Midwest - St. Louis's downtown is coming back really strong and the employers you listed are quite diverse. I would personally like to check out St. Louis one of these days to see what's going on there. If DET continues to decline, STL, could easily swoop in and become the second most important city in the Midwest. For now, DET is second in importance, but not by much.

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>

St. Louis has lost more people than Detroit percentage wise (about 2/3s vs about 1 half) and is actually losing people faster than Detroit. Crime is just as much a problem in StL as it is Detroit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not to make excuses, however there are some things to keep in mind regarding St. Louis. The St. Louis city limits are small, the county is huge. Crime stats in the county are low, but spike in the inner city...there's not a huge area to spread out the stats...thus giving an impression of a high crime rate. I do not know if this is the same problem in Detroit. Also, regarding population loss there are some things to consider. The city is seeing a record number of construction permits for both housing and retail. It's a boom unlike anything in recent years. I do not want to pretend problems don't exist, however things are certainly moving in the right direction...not something we could say 10 years ago. In addition, even when the city was experiencing a population loss, the region was still growing...people were not leaving the metro area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Detroit is obviously the answer and that's not hometown bias. Minneapolis is nice and so are St. Louis and Cleveland, but none of them come close to Detroit when you take all things into account.

People don't realize this, but the Detroit CSA is bigger than the Minneapolis and Cincinnati CSAs combined. Minneapolis (3.3 million) + Cincinnati (2.1 million) = Detroit (5.4 million)

Also, Detroit is in no danger of being surpassed by Minneapolis any time soon. The Minneapolis CSA is only gaining about 20,000 more people than the Detroit CSA each year. At that pace, it would take 105 years for Minneapolis to pass Detroit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If 2nd most important simply means Detroit, than yes Detroit is the answer. However I do believe more people nationwide would choose city's like St. Louis, Minneapolis, and Kansas City if given an option over Detroit. They are much cleaner, are much easier to manage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that no Midwest cities (other than Chicago) can touch Detroit when it comes to economic might and population, but quite honestly, almost all of them surpass Detroit in other important urban qualities. Detroit is extremely car-dependent, moreso than many Midwest cities. It also has a comparitively small tourism industry. As for the health of downtown, Detroit trails most other cities in attractiveness and livability. As much as I truly love Detroit (from the bottom of my heart), it simply is not a very inviting city.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

that whole tourism in Michigan thing cracks me up, yes it is a large industry for the state, but outstate michigan see's three times as many tourists as the Metro Detroit area. The most tourism in that state comes from the Lake Michigan coast, I believe the city of Grand Rapids which is basically an obscure midsize city, gets more tourism dollars than Detroit. But coming from someone who lives in Denver and has never even been to Michigan, or the midwest really, I'd say Detroit has so much more clout in terms of importance than the other cities mentioned in that list. There's no comparison. As I'm doing research, I see that Detroit's suburbs are wealthier than even Chicago's suburbs, Whats the deal with Oakland county anyway?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

However when it comes to International Gross Domestic Product, the highest per-capita contributors (1998 figures, so they are a bit out of date) are Minneapolis/St. Paul (ranking 4th Internationally), followed by Chicago (12th), Milwaukee (22nd), St. Louis (24th), Cleveland (27th), Columbus (29th), Cincinnati (31st), Kansas City (33rd), and then Detroit (36th). (See http://www.demographia.com/db-intlgdp-metro.htm for details.)

Regarding business, the employment in Midwestern Central Business Districts is:

1. Chicago (336,300)

2. Minneapolis/St.Paul (128,400 in Mpls, 40,300 in St.Paul)

3. Cleveland (107,000)

4. St. Louis (101,700)

5. Milwaukee (86,500)

6. Indianapolis (85,800)

7. Cincinnati (77,200)

8. Detroit (74,300)

These numbers serve to indicate the general business health of a downtown region. In actual metropolitan employment, the numbers rank right along with the region's population of course, with Chicago at #1, Detroit at #2, the Twin Cities at #3, and Cleveland at #4. (See http://www.demographia.com/db-intlgdp-metro.htm for details.)

So Detroit, with it's larger population still contributes approximately 131 billion dollars to the GDP even though it's ranked well down on the list of GDP per capita. The Twin Cities contribute approximately 100 billion dollars.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.