Jump to content

New Greenville developments


gs3

Recommended Posts


  • 1 month later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

It has been long planned, and even reported on various Greenville-related sites, to increase the density and usage of the property. Much of the current land area is taken up by the parking lot, which has a far greater capacity than needed. Instead of a single structure, this will become an office development with multiple buildings. The existing multitenant building, of which Agfa HealthCare is the primary tenant, will remain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RiverWalker said:

It has been long planned, and even reported on various Greenville-related sites, to increase the density and usage of the property. Much of the current land area is taken up by the parking lot, which has a far greater capacity than needed. Instead of a single structure, this will become an office development with multiple buildings. The existing multitenant building, of which Agfa HealthCare is the primary tenant, will remain.

Do you know how tall the buildings will be?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

So I found where another Lowe's foods is going. On Pelham Road where Pelham Road Alliance Church currently stands (2702 Pelham Rd). I'm at least glad that it will have access to the light. I saw the sign this morning going to work and was curious. Good location for them I believe, the Super Bi-Lo will need to step up. (Edit - It looks like another one is going at the Davis Crossing @ Woodruff and Lee Vaughn Roads - I put that info below the Pelham location's info. It says Food Lion is the owner on the application, does Food Lion own Lowe's or are they selling to them?).

Here's the info:

 

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/shoppes_application.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/shoppes_siteplan.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/shoppes_landscapeplan.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/shoppes_elevationA1.2.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/shoppes_elevationA1.3.pdf

Lowes.PNG

And here is the store going in at Davis Crossing:

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/dc_application.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/dc_siteplan.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/dc_bldevelations.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/dc_mainstore.pdf

http://www.greenvillecounty.org/gcpc/current_planning/pdf/dc_mainmonument.pdf

Capture.PNG

Edited by johnpro318
Added info on Davis Crossing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure if this is the correct thread for this topic, but.......

As many of you know, the city of Greenville is rewriting it’s guidelines for projects in the central business district.  This guildeline will shape and fashion new and renovation projects in the downtown area for the foreseeable future.  The team that is assisting with these guidelines has created an opinion survey to get feedback from the community at-large.  Please take a moment to provide your input.  The survey will close at the end of next week so please complete it as soon as possible!

 

Here’s a link to the website that explains the city’s objective and timeline related to the new Guildelines:

 

http://www.greenvillesc.gov/1248/Design-Guidelines-Update

 

Here’s a link directly to the survey:

 

https://survey.co1.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_5uT0YHMCxzBghXT
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/23/2016 at 1:45 AM, apaladin said:

One thing that is a little scary is "review the no height limit" to see if certain districts/areas should have a limit.

It isn't like Greenville is on the verge of becoming the next Dubai. If the city is mulling over the next  Burj Khalifa and where to put it, maybe this would be a big deal.  We still have plenty of room and we dont have the density to merit super structures nor do we need worry about sprawl at this point.  If the goal is to keep Greenville a place that people enjoy being in, I say that is a good goal to have and damn the tall buildings.  There, I said it. :-)  This is based on the assumption that tall buildings would be free to grow in a central business district and special exceptions can be made when a really amazing project presents itself or a very good developer wants to invest a lot in a particular spot (The Grand Bohemian comes to mind, normally I would say keep height under control near the park, this one I expect will be so well done that it will be an addition to the scenery, not a detraction).

Edited by gvegascple
clarification
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought of another instance where limiting height might come in handy.  Where development areas butt up against residential.  A three story or greater building could block out sun, views and cast shadows impacting the life of residents,  Making developments get special exemptions only after ensuring the residences are not negatively impacted is a nice way to look out for the people living near these areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would have to assume that alot of this stems from the Pendleton St. Church project and the neighboring community. I get it. Most development is spreading out so fast that surrounding neighborhoods want assurances that they won't be next. And there will be a next one. Think County Square, areas along Church, Main, and of course Pendleton Streets. There are countless number of other examples and you all get the jest. Planning is important. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

It's interesting to use Google's Timelapse Engine to quickly look at local growth through 22 years of satellite imagery.

https://earthengine.google.com/timelapse/

A couple of observations: (1) growth east of Hwy 25 / White Horse has significantly outpaced westward development. (2) Watching Woodruff, and then Verdae, almost explode in growth overnight is very interesting (and disappointing, where are the new roads to support this development?). 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.